Partnerships in today’s world

We keep hearing governments across Europe tell us that “we’re all in this together”. British newspapers in particular seem to take great delight in reporting examples of how some of the more wealthy members of the current cabinet are “out of touch” with ordinary people. The recent story about whether or not to charge VAT on hot “pasties” was just one example. But in general, it seems that most people in the UK realise that by working together – in partnership if you will – things will eventually get better. Certainly the huge deficit is being reined in although there is a long way to go.

Since the last edition, I have had the pleasure of attending the long awaited wedding of two good friends. It was a lovely affair; my partner and I had a very jolly time and we wish the newlyweds a long and above all, a very happy, marriage.

Going to the ceremony got me thinking – weddings do that, don’t they? – and all the talk of partnerships led me down several paths. What constitutes a partnership anyway? And when we hear the term in a business context, is it based on the same principles as two people who call themselves “partners”?

A simple definition of partnership is that it is an arrangement where parties agree to cooperate to advance their mutual interests. But let’s go back a little to explore the term used by individuals in their personal lives, rather than the business context.

Years ago, if one was neither married nor engaged but still committed to another person in a steady relationship, the words “boyfriend” or “girlfriend” seemed to do perfectly well (although I accept it sounded rather odd when describing people old enough to be one’s parents). The term “common law marriage” was one taught to me by my mother although I used to get alarmed at the level of vitriol in her voice when she said “common” – as if there were something dreadfully wrong about it all.

Fast forward 25 years and the word “partner” seems now to be the in-phrase. Time was, just a few years ago in fact, that if I had referred to my partner in polite company, there’d be a short intake of breath for it was taken as read that I had to be referring to another man. In these days when so many people maintain a relationship without ever entering into marriage, the term partner could just as well refer to a girlfriend of several years’ standing. It’s all become rather confusing.

In the UK, it was the Labour government that took the politically brave and potentially risky decision to enact civil partnership legislation in 2004. Possibly soon to be extended to Gibraltar, the legislation set out clear guidelines for the first time relating to the responsibilities of partners and the benefits to be gained from entering into such an arrangement. Aimed at same-sex couples, there have been complaints of discrimination ever since from straight couples who do not wish to enter into marriage but seek the financial and legal benefits of a partnership arrangement. So far the government has maintained that such people can simply get married but sometimes it’s more complicated than that.

The civil partnership legislation is very clear. In exchange for a series of undertakings and legal definitions of what constitutes the partnership between two people, several important benefits arise. The most important implications from a financial perspective are probably those dealing with succession issues and inheritance tax in the UK and the setting out of new rules relating to next of kin and a lot more besides. Sadly – but inevitably – it also goes into considerable detail about how such partnerships should be dissolved.

These new rules in effect brought into force for individuals important aspects of legislation that had previously only been available in a corporate setting. Business partnerships, as we shall see, are nothing new. Legal partnerships come in several shapes and sizes but they all follow a similar pattern. It is also now very common to see the initials LP (standing for limited partnership) or LLP (limited liability partnership) appended to the name of many of our large firms, legal and accountancy in particular.

But hang on. Surely partnerships – law firms, doctors and so on – were not supposed to be able to limit their liability. Wasn’t that the whole point? In exchange for the comforting knowledge that the partners in question, whether they were drafting a contract or diagnosing a condition, were putting not just their professional reputations on the line but also their assets. Of course, insurance was used to mitigate some of this risk but ultimately their judgment, and that of their colleagues, was backed by individual partners’ wealth.

In several jurisdictions, many of them based on English law, partnerships as a separate legal entity have become far more popular in recent years. Essentially the intention was to retain the benefits of partnership whilst allowing at least some protection associated with limited liability. But this concept is not restricted to English law and is certainly nothing new.

In the third Century BC, Roman societates publicanorum exhibited many similarities to the company structures we see today – but at least one partner had to be included who was fully liable for the entity’s debts. Across the Islamic world too, such arrangements became common. In Europe, the Italian commenda of the tenth Century were the forerunners of the LPs and LLPs we see today.

As always there are differences across the various jurisdictions where such structures can be established but the general principles are similar enough. A limited partnership may typically have up to 20 members, at least one of which is a “general” partner. This general partner has the power to bind the partnership by entering into contracts and so on and also assumes unlimited liability for the debts and obligations of the partnership. This potential liability can itself be mitigated if the general partner is itself established as a limited company.

In these circumstances, the other partners could enjoy “limited” liability in respect of the partnership in much the same way that shareholders in a company know that their financial risk is limited to the amount of capital that they have invested into the company. It follows that these limited partners may not take part in the management of the company nor are they able to bind it contractually. The limited liability partnership differs in that there are limitations in liability for all partners.

Assuming such partnerships are properly structured from the outset, limited partnerships can be extremely flexible. Within reason, they are able to do anything a “natural person” – that is someone like you or me acting in an individual capacity – can do. A partnership can enter into contracts, own assets and, importantly, it can carry on in existence despite any changes in the status of the individual partners. In other words, in many ways such partnership “entities” are much more closely related to companies than a traditional partnership of old.

Tax advantages are likely to result because, generally speaking, these types of structures are established so that profits are taxable in the hands of the partners rather than the partnership itself – in the US, this is often referred to as “look-through treatment” because the taxman will “look-through” the partnership structure to assess the individual partners. Additionally, limited partnerships allow for the issue of shares in cases where other corporate facilities may not be desirable.

In summary, partnerships can offer the managers of businesses a more flexible, modern approach to liability and risk management in general. Their benefits were there for the Romans more than 2,000 years ago and I imagine the law relating to partnerships will continue to develop further in millennia to come. They are not necessarily simple to establish so, as always, professional advice should be sought at the earliest stage.

And so back to those friends whose marriage we have just celebrated. I happen to know that they read The Gibraltar Magazine – at least I hope they do for the lady in question happens to be the magazine’s editor. From my own partner and me and on behalf of my colleagues at Sovereign too, I say congratulations and we wish you a long and happy partnership.